Judicial swansong

Ward LJ (now Sir Alan) marked his retirement in a judgment displaying the wit and wisdom which has brought him so many admirers over the years.

Wright v (1) Michael Wright (Supplies) Ltd (2) Turner Wright Investments Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ

Procedure, Appeals

No right to cross-undertaking when public duty exercised

There is no general rule that an authority like the Financial Services Authority acting pursuant to a public duty should be required to give to the court a cross-undertaking in damages in favour of third parties affected by the obtaining of a freezing injunction.

Financial Services Authority v Sinaloa Gold plc and others (Barclays Bank plc intervening) Supreme Court TLR 29 March

Procedure, Damages

Court of Protection and Family Division

The principle that applications for committal for contempt of court be heard in open court applied as much to the Court of Protection and the Family Division as it did to other divisions of the High Court and the discretion to hear a committal application in private should be exercised only in exceptional cases.

Practice Areas, Family

Unbundling

The Law Society has issued a practice note giving guidance on the “unbundling” of family services clarifying the extent of the role of solicitors.

Practice Areas, Solicitors

Judicial appointments

Miss Sue Lascelles Carr, QC, Robert Maurice Jay, Esquire, QC, and His Honour Judge Andrew James Gilbart, QC, have been appointed High Court Judges assigned to the Queen’s Bench Division

The client who vanished with the costs

Delivering judgment in Khans Solicitors v Chifuntwe [2013] EWCA Civ 481; SJ 14 May, Sir Stephen Sedley said the Treasury Solicitor paid the £6,000 to Chifuntwe, who, “as Khans had warned them might happen – has vanished with it”.

Withdrawal

Berg v Blackburn Rovers Football Club & Athletic plc: Chancery Division, Manchester District Registry: 29 April 2013; LSG 9 May

The claimant was employed by the defendant football club as club manager. The terms of his contract of employment were contained in a service agreement signed in November 2012.

CPR, Costs

Against legal representatives

Heron v TNT (UK) Ltd and another [2013] EWCA Civ 469, [2013] All ER (D) 28 (May); NLJ 10 May

A non-party costs order may be made against legal representatives, but in every case, such an order was exceptional. Generally speaking, the discretion would not be exercised against “pure funders”.

Costs, Conditional Fee Agreements

Payment on account

Harrison and another v Black Horse Ltd [2013] EWHC B5 (Costs) We are grateful to David Bowden of SCM Solicitors for this report

Under the terms of a consent order made by the Supreme Court, the appellants were entitled to their recoverable costs and to be assessed by way of detailed assessment in the Senior Courts Costs Office if not agreed. The costs claimed in respect of the proceedings in the County Court, High Court and Court of Appeal totalled over £1.5m.

CPR, Costs

Pre-action

Roche Diagnostics Ltd v Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust [2013] EWHC 933 (TCC), [2013] All ER (D) 133 (April); NLJ 3 May

The defendant was responsible for a number of hospitals in West Yorkshire. It was seeking to let a managed service contract for the provision of laboratory services at three main centres.

Procedure, CPR

Correct approach

O’Flaherty v Revenue and Customs Commissioners: Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber): 4 April 2013; LSG 2 May

The taxpayer was at the material time the proprietor of a pub and hotel in Liverpool, which he ran as a sole trader. The pub business commenced in 2003 and the hotel business in 2004.

Costs, Solicitors

Breach of worldwide injunction

Attorney general v Harkins; Attorney general v Liddle: Queen’s Bench Division: 26 April 2013; LSG 7 May

In February 1993, a two-year-old had been killed by two 11-year-olds (V and T). In November, V and T had been convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment.

Practice Areas, Human Rights

Claimant litigated in name of dead mother

Bank of Scotland v Azam Qutb [2012] EWCA Civ 1661; SJ 10 May

The Qutb case started in March 2002 as a possession action brought by the bank in relation to a property which had been sold by Mrs Qutb to the bank’s customer, Mr Hussain, who charged it to the bank. The transfer to Mr Hussain was challenged by Mrs Qutb and eventually set aside. Mr Hussain was convicted of fraud and jailed.

Practice Areas, Property

Interim injunction not appropriate

Vaughan v Lewisham Borough Council and others [2013] EWHC 795 (QB), [2013] All ER (D) 226 (April); NLJ 10 May

The parties to litigation should generally be free to prepare for it without the interference of an injunction, statements and publications in the course of defending proceedings were likely to be protected by absolute privilege.

Practice Areas, Defamation